Auditing Profession Act, 2005 (Act No. 26 of 2005)Board NoticesIndependent Regulatory Board for AuditorsNew Rules Regarding Improper Conduct and Code of Professional Conduct for Registered AuditorsCode of Professional Conduct for Registered AuditorsPart B : Registered Auditors in Public PracticeSection 290 : Independence-Audit and Review EngagementsCompensation and Evaluation Policies |
290.228 | A self-interest threat is created when a member of the audit team is evaluated on or compensated for selling non-assurance services to that audit client. The significance of the threat will depend on: |
• | The proportion of the individual's compensation or performance evaluation that is based on the sale of such services; |
• | The role of the individual on the audit team; and |
• | Whether promotion decisions are influenced by the sale of such services. |
The significance of the threat shall be evaluated and, if the threat is not at an acceptable level, the firm shall either revise the compensation plan or evaluation process for that individual or apply safeguards to eliminate the threat or reduce it to an acceptable level.
Examples of such safeguards include:
• | Removing such members from the audit team; or |
• | Having a registered auditor review the work of the member of the audit team. |
290.229 | A key audit partner shall not be evaluated on or compensated based on that partner's success in selling non-assurance services to the partner's audit client. This is not intended to prohibit normal profit- sharing arrangements between partners of a firm. |